Enterprise RAG systems built around your company knowledge
Paloren designs and builds enterprise RAG systems that turn company documents, data and processes into trusted answers. Request an AI readiness assessment.
Leaders at mid-size and large companies who need answers grounded in their own data
Paloren builds enterprise RAG systems, the retrieval layer that lets companies ask questions and receive answers grounded in their own documents, data and processes. Projects start with a readiness assessment, then scale into a full company brain.
Enterprise RAG, short for retrieval augmented generation, connects a language model to the knowledge a company already holds. Instead of relying on general training data, the system searches internal documents, records and databases, retrieves the relevant passages and generates an answer with citations back to the source.
A basic chatbot answers from what the model learned in training, so it can only speak in generalities about your business. An enterprise RAG system answers with specifics: which policy applies, which figure is current, which process your team agreed last quarter.
That difference is why RAG sits at the centre of the company brain Paloren builds. Retrieval also keeps answers current. When a document changes, the updated version becomes the source of truth without retraining a model.
For larger organisations, the retrieval layer adds access control, so different teams see answers drawn from the records they are permitted to read. The result is an assistant that behaves like a knowledgeable colleague who has read everything, remembers everything and can show its work.
Keep these in view
Retrieval grounds every answer in your own records, not general model knowledge
Citations show where each claim came from
Access control keeps sensitive answers within the right teams
Updated sources change answers without retraining
Most companies do not lack information; they lack a way to retrieve it quickly. Knowledge sits in shared drives, inboxes, ticketing systems, CRM fields, spreadsheets and the heads of long-serving staff.
Each tool has its own search, and none of them understands a question the way a person asks it. Teams end up reconstructing answers by hand: hunting through version history, pinging colleagues, pasting excerpts into chat windows.
Paloren combines implementation, workflow design and practical team training. Valuable answers existed, yet nobody could assemble them fast enough to matter at decision time.
Document sprawl creates a second problem: conflicting versions. When three documents describe the same process differently, staff either guess or escalate. Enterprise RAG addresses both problems by making sources queryable and by pointing every answer to a specific document you can verify.
Paloren treats retrieval as an information design exercise before a technology exercise. We map where knowledge lives, who owns it, which version is authoritative and what a good answer looks like for each team.
Only then do we build the pipeline that turns scattered records into reliable answers.
| Layer | What it does | Enterprise decision it carries |
|---|---|---|
| Ingestion | Connects document stores, CRM records, call transcripts and reporting outputs | Which systems are authoritative and how often content refreshes |
| Processing | Splits documents into passages and attaches metadata | How ownership, dates and sensitivity are recorded |
| Retrieval | Interprets each question and ranks the most relevant passages | How access permissions and source hierarchy apply |
| Generation | Composes an answer from retrieved passages with citations | Which model, tone and refusal rules apply |
| Evaluation | Tests answers against real questions and sources | What quality threshold must hold before release |
Each layer carries decisions that separate enterprise builds from consumer chatbots.
Source: Paloren published service ranges
| Engagement | Typical scope | Investment | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI readiness assessment | Maps sources, gaps and risks before any build | From USD 8k | 2-3 weeks |
| AI strategy | Sets the roadmap for RAG and wider AI adoption | USD 12k-25k | 3-4 weeks |
| Company brain | Connects documents, CRM, reporting and workflows into one governed system | USD 60k-150k | 8-12 weeks |
| AI agents | Agents that answer from your records and then act | USD 40k-90k | 6-10 weeks |
| Workflow automation and integrations | Extends retrieval into automated next steps | USD 15k-60k | 3-8 weeks |
| CRM implementation with AI | Brings live account records into the answer layer | USD 20k-80k | 4-10 weeks |
Standard ranges applied worldwide; final scope is quoted after the readiness assessment.
Source: Paloren published service ranges
| Source type | Examples | Questions it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Documents | Policies, playbooks, contracts, proposals | Which rule, term or process applies |
| CRM records | Accounts, deals, activities | Where an account stands and what was agreed |
| Call analysis | Transcribed sales and service conversations | What buyers and customers keep raising |
| Reporting outputs | Dashboards and AI reporting | Which numbers moved and why they matter |
| Content systems | Approved copy and positioning | Which claims and messages are current |
Source types connected through the company brain approach Paloren applies worldwide.
Source: Paloren published service ranges
Keep these in view
Knowledge scattered across drives, inboxes, CRM fields and spreadsheets
Tool search cannot handle questions asked the way people ask them
Conflicting document versions force staff to guess or escalate
Enterprise RAG makes sources queryable and verifiable
Paloren treats enterprise RAG as the retrieval layer of a company brain rather than a standalone widget. A company brain connects your documents, CRM, automation workflows and communication records into one governed system that answers questions and takes action.
The build usually starts with an AI readiness assessment, which maps your sources, identifies quality gaps and defines the first questions the system must answer.
From there, Paloren designs the ingestion pipeline, the retrieval structure and the generation layer, then connects the result to the places your teams already work, whether that is the CRM, an internal portal or a custom app.
Each connection matters. CRM integration lets the system answer with live account data. Call analysis turns conversations into searchable knowledge. Workflow automation lets an answer trigger the next step, such as drafting a follow-up or opening a ticket.
Governance wraps around everything, defining who can ask what and which sources are authoritative. The company brain is therefore not one product but a capability assembled around how your business actually runs.
Keep these in view
RAG serves as the retrieval layer of a wider company brain
Connections span CRM, calls, reporting, documents and workflows
Governance defines who can ask what and which sources are authoritative
The fastest returns usually come from questions teams ask repeatedly and answer slowly today. Sales support is a common starting point: a retrieval system connected to the CRM lets account teams ask about deal history, contracted terms or product fit without exporting reports.
Support and operations follow a similar pattern, with the system answering process questions from playbooks and past tickets, then drafting the response a human reviews. Call analysis is another early win.
Reporting questions suit RAG well because numbers change constantly and retraining a model on each update is impractical. Leadership asks the system rather than waiting for the next dashboard session.
Content teams use retrieval to keep every asset aligned with current positioning and approved claims. Paloren sequences these use cases deliberately: one question set, one source, one measurable outcome first, then expansion.
A narrow first deployment proves the pipeline, builds team confidence and surfaces the data issues that would otherwise appear mid-project at greater cost.
Keep these in view
Sales and account teams query deal history without exporting reports
Call analysis turns conversations into searchable knowledge
Reporting answers stay current without retraining
Start narrow: one question set, one source, one measurable outcome
An enterprise RAG build has five moving parts. Ingestion connects your repositories, from document stores and CRM records to call transcripts and reporting outputs, and keeps content fresh as sources change.
Processing prepares that content for retrieval: documents are split into passages, metadata such as owner, date and system of origin is attached, and sensitive material is flagged.
Retrieval is the search layer that interprets a question, finds the most relevant passages and ranks them by fit. Generation is the language model step that composes an answer from the retrieved passages and attaches citations.
Evaluation closes the loop with tests that check whether answers match their sources and whether retrieval surfaces the right passages for real questions. Each layer carries enterprise decisions a consumer chatbot never faces.
Access rules must follow content into the index, so a person asking about contracts only retrieves what their role permits. Source hierarchy resolves conflicts when two documents disagree.
Freshness rules decide how quickly a changed document replaces its older version in the index. Paloren designs these layers as one connected system rather than a pile of tools, because failure modes usually appear at the seams, where ingestion, retrieval and generation hand work to each other.
Keep these in view
Five layers: ingestion, processing, retrieval, generation and evaluation
Access rules travel with content into the index
Source hierarchy resolves conflicts between documents
Failure modes appear at the seams between layers
Enterprise RAG earns its budget through measurable answer quality, not enthusiasm for the technology. Paloren defines success before build: a list of real questions drawn from the teams who will use the system, a definition of a correct answer for each, and the sources a correct answer must cite.
During delivery, evaluation runs against that list. Retrieval tests check whether the system surfaces the right passages. Generation tests check whether the answer stays faithful to those passages without inventing detail.
Citations are checked so every claim traces to a document a reviewer can open. Beyond accuracy, adoption measures matter: which teams use the system, which questions they ask, where the system declines and hands off to a person, and how often people stop asking.
Paloren also watches cost per question as volume grows, because retrieval design choices made early determine whether the system scales economically. When quality dips, the diagnosis points to a specific layer, a retrieval miss, a stale source or a generation drift, and the fix lands where the problem actually lives.
Keep these in view
Success defined before build with real questions and correct-answer criteria
Retrieval and generation tested separately, citations verified
Adoption tracked: who asks, what they ask, where handoffs happen
Diagnosis points to a specific layer when quality dips
Governance decides whether an enterprise RAG system can be trusted with sensitive questions. Paloren builds governance into the company brain from the start. Access control mirrors your existing permissions, so the system never reveals a record to someone who could not open it in the source system.
A source register lists every connected repository, its owner and its standing as authoritative or reference material, which prevents an outdated document from quietly overriding a current one.
Change handling keeps the index honest: when owners update or retire a document, the pipeline reflects that change on a defined schedule. Audit trails record what was asked, what was retrieved and what was answered, so any response can be reviewed after the fact.
Paloren pairs these controls with AI governance work that sets policy for model use, data handling and escalation, and with team training so people know how to question the system and when to verify.
The work Paloren people did inside organisations such as IBM, Ford, LG, Unilever, Jaguar and Chelsea FC shaped this view: systems survive when rules are explicit and ownership is named.
Governance is not a document filed away; it is the mechanism that keeps answers trustworthy as the business changes.
Keep these in view
Access control mirrors existing system permissions
Source register names owners and marks authoritative material
Audit trails record questions, retrievals and answers
Governance pairs with team training and AI policy work
Paloren prices enterprise RAG within two engagements. The company brain, the fullest expression of RAG across a business, runs USD 60k-150k over 8-12 weeks, connecting documents, CRM, reporting and workflows into one governed retrieval system.
Where the focus is agentic retrieval, AI agents that answer and then act, the range is USD 40k-90k over 6-10 weeks. Supporting engagements set the stage: an AI readiness assessment starts from USD 8k over 2-3 weeks and maps sources, gaps and risks; an AI strategy engagement runs USD 12k-25k over 3-4 weeks and sets the roadmap.
Workflow automation that extends RAG into action ranges USD 15k-60k over 3-8 weeks, and CRM implementation with AI ranges USD 20k-80k over 4-10 weeks when retrieval needs to reach account records.
Ongoing support starts from USD 2,500 per month for 10 hours, covering monitoring, evaluation and refinement as volume grows. Scope drives position within each range: the number of sources, the complexity of permissions, the integrations required and how much of the pipeline must be rebuilt versus connected.
Paloren quotes after the readiness assessment, so the range you receive reflects your actual systems rather than an assumption. Every figure here is the standard Paloren range, applied worldwide.
Keep these in view
Company brain: USD 60k-150k over 8-12 weeks
AI agents that answer and act: USD 40k-90k over 6-10 weeks
Readiness assessment from USD 8k over 2-3 weeks
Support from USD 2,500 per month for 10 hours
Paloren was built for this work specifically. Paloren combines implementation, workflow design and practical team training. That background shapes how Paloren builds. We start with the questions your teams need answered, not with a tool.
We design retrieval, governance and integrations as one system, so the answer layer reaches the records that matter. We train your people, because adoption decides value more than architecture does.
And we serve companies worldwide with one standard of delivery. Enterprise RAG succeeds when strategy, build and habits change together, and Paloren covers all three.
Keep these in view
Team experience across IBM, Ford, LG, Unilever, Jaguar and Chelsea FC
Strategy, build, governance and training delivered together
One standard of delivery for companies worldwide
What you take forward
Request an AI readiness assessment
Book a readiness assessment and Paloren will map your sources, flag gaps and set a sequence for enterprise RAG, then outline the first project scope, investment range and timeline.
Paloren maps your sources, ownership and data quality, then flags the gaps that would undermine retrieval, in an assessment starting from USD 8k over 2-3 weeks.
A strategy engagement of USD 12k-25k over 3-4 weeks defines which questions the system must answer first and which sources count as authoritative.
Ingestion, processing, retrieval and generation are built and connected to your systems, with access rules and citations designed around your organisation.
Evaluation runs against real questions from your teams until answers meet the agreed quality threshold, before any wider release.
Paloren delivers team training and AI governance so people use the system well, and support continues from USD 2,500 per month for 10 hours.
| Layer | What it does | Enterprise decision it carries |
|---|---|---|
| Ingestion | Connects document stores, CRM records, call transcripts and reporting outputs | Which systems are authoritative and how often content refreshes |
| Processing | Splits documents into passages and attaches metadata | How ownership, dates and sensitivity are recorded |
| Retrieval | Interprets each question and ranks the most relevant passages | How access permissions and source hierarchy apply |
| Generation | Composes an answer from retrieved passages with citations | Which model, tone and refusal rules apply |
| Evaluation | Tests answers against real questions and sources | What quality threshold must hold before release |
Each layer carries decisions that separate enterprise builds from consumer chatbots.
Paloren published service ranges
| Engagement | Typical scope | Investment | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI readiness assessment | Maps sources, gaps and risks before any build | From USD 8k | 2-3 weeks |
| AI strategy | Sets the roadmap for RAG and wider AI adoption | USD 12k-25k | 3-4 weeks |
| Company brain | Connects documents, CRM, reporting and workflows into one governed system | USD 60k-150k | 8-12 weeks |
| AI agents | Agents that answer from your records and then act | USD 40k-90k | 6-10 weeks |
| Workflow automation and integrations | Extends retrieval into automated next steps | USD 15k-60k | 3-8 weeks |
| CRM implementation with AI | Brings live account records into the answer layer | USD 20k-80k | 4-10 weeks |
Standard ranges applied worldwide; final scope is quoted after the readiness assessment.
| Source type | Examples | Questions it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Documents | Policies, playbooks, contracts, proposals | Which rule, term or process applies |
| CRM records | Accounts, deals, activities | Where an account stands and what was agreed |
| Call analysis | Transcribed sales and service conversations | What buyers and customers keep raising |
| Reporting outputs | Dashboards and AI reporting | Which numbers moved and why they matter |
| Content systems | Approved copy and positioning | Which claims and messages are current |
Source types connected through the company brain approach Paloren applies worldwide.
Readiness assessment report mapping sources, gaps and risks
Enterprise RAG pipeline connecting documents, CRM and reporting into one index
Answer layer with citations, access rules and source hierarchy
Evaluation suite built on real questions from your teams
Governance policy and team training for daily use
Enterprise RAG stands for retrieval augmented generation applied inside a company. The system searches your own documents, CRM records, call transcripts and reports, retrieves the relevant passages and generates an answer that cites its sources.
Instead of general model knowledge, answers reflect what your business has written and recorded, which makes them specific, current and verifiable.
A standard chatbot answers from general training data and cannot see your records. An enterprise RAG system retrieves passages from your own sources before generating a response, so answers name the policy, figure or agreement that applies.
It also carries enterprise controls, including access permissions, source hierarchy and citations, which consumer chatbots do not provide.
Paloren connects the systems where company knowledge already lives: document stores, CRM records, call transcripts, reporting outputs and content libraries. The company brain approach treats every source as part of one governed index, with ownership and authority defined for each.
During the readiness assessment, we identify which sources to connect first and which need cleanup before retrieval can trust them.
The company brain engagement, which carries full enterprise RAG, runs 8-12 weeks. AI agents that retrieve and then act run 6-10 weeks. Most companies begin with an AI readiness assessment of 2-3 weeks, sometimes followed by a 3-4 week strategy engagement.
Timelines reflect how many sources connect, how permissions work and how much integration the pipeline needs.
A company brain runs USD 60k-150k over 8-12 weeks. AI agents range from USD 40k-90k over 6-10 weeks. The readiness assessment starts from USD 8k over 2-3 weeks, and AI strategy runs USD 12k-25k over 3-4 weeks.
Ongoing support starts from USD 2,500 per month for 10 hours. Paloren quotes precise pricing after the assessment.
Some preparation helps, but a full cleanup project is rarely the right first move. The readiness assessment identifies which sources are trustworthy, which have conflicting versions and which are missing ownership.
Paloren then fixes what matters for the first question set rather than waiting for a company-wide cleanup, because retrieval quality improves fastest where the first answers depend on it.
Retrieval does most of the work: the system answers from passages found in your sources rather than from memory, and every claim carries a citation a reviewer can open. Evaluation tests run against real questions before release, and the system declines when retrieval finds nothing solid.
Governance, including source hierarchy and audit trails, keeps accuracy measurable over time.
Yes. Integrations bring live account and activity records into the answer layer, and workflow automation lets an answer trigger the next step, such as drafting a follow-up or opening a ticket in your existing tools.
You do. Paloren builds the system inside your environment and against your sources, Data handling, model providers and retention are agreed in writing during scoping, and your records are not used to train third-party models where providers allow that to be excluded.
Documentation, evaluation suites and governance policy transfer at handover, and team training equips your people to run daily use. Ongoing support is optional, starting from USD 2,500 per month for 10 hours.
Paloren works with companies worldwide. Delivery follows one standard model wherever you are based, and pricing applies globally in USD, so ranges such as USD 60k-150k for a company brain hold across regions.
The readiness assessment is the natural first step for any location, because it maps your sources and sets the scope before any build begins.
What should your RAG system answer first?
Request an AI readiness assessment
